Thursday, August 4, 2011

Analyzing Scope Creep

“A project without a critical path is like a ship without a rudder.”
~ D. Meyer, Illinois Construction Law ~



Projects can be fun, but also frustrating when they do not go according to plan. Several years ago my husband and I decided to build a new home. We felt it would be a great project with a perfect ending. Looking back now it is amazing we even finished the project. Be it personal or professional, projects need plans. Plans keep you focused and on target. Plans also need someone to assume responsibility (which we did not have for our new home project) so a project manager (PM) can help keep a project from falling off the rails or can assist when a project experiences changes beyond the scope of work initially identified (Portny et al. 2008).

Several years ago our education group was tasked with designing a new protocol book for our paramedic body. This book would detail all the pre-hospital directives that paramedics were allowed to do in the field. The previous book was outdated and needed a ‘fresh’ look. The project manager for the team developed a plan and received approval from the local medical directors. The project was proceeding on schedule when scope creep hit us directly in the face. The project manager was promoted to another position within the organization leaving us leaderless. Our manager quickly stepped in and took responsibility. There lied the main problem with our project. Our ‘new’ project manager felt the project needed a different format and decided to change the overall look of the book despite approving the initial plans. The old PM neglected to communicate with the manager leaving the manager to wonder if the existing plans were really working.  “Sometimes changes must occur due to a change in vision, a change in the needs of the customer, even a sudden change in budget” (Lynch & Roecker, 2007, p. 96).

We discussed the new format collectively as a group and realized it was a better format than the original, but worried about our timeline and the additional costs needed to manage the project. The project manager decided to revisit the communication plan and update the baseline plan (Lynch & Roecker, 2007). Fortunately the PM recognized the importance of communicating with the stakeholders and met with them to discuss the new format.  “If new issues arise that were not identified during the planning phase of the project, the communications plan may be used to categorize the issue and identify which stakeholders will be concerned” (Lynch & Roecker, 2007, p.104).
The changes were significant, but manageable given our team worked well together and communicated daily (amongst ourselves). The PM stayed focused and pinpointed the exact changes needed, along with discussing the changes with our team (Greer, 2010). Our completed protocol books were delayed by four months and over budget, but the project was deemed a success.


Although I agree with the new format and changes required, I would have done things differently had I been project manager. For one thing, management should have promoted someone from the initial team as project manager, as several of us were experienced with managing projects (excluding myself). Communication existed among the team but not with the stakeholders. When changes were requested that impacted the entire project, I would have first obtained written approval of the changes from the stakeholders and communicated the impact of the changes with the entire team (Greer, 2010).
Gube (2008) noted there are eight tips to remember when managing scope creep. They include:
  • Accept that feature creep will happen (also called scope creep)
  • Commit enough time to requirements- gathering
  • Giving a hand might cost you your arm
  • Be the devil’s advocate when changes are requested
  • Be task-oriented, not vision-oriented
  • Shed the ‘Customer is Always Right’ mentality
  • Research before committing
  • Realize that feature creep is a two-way street

“Project management (PM) is not rocket science” (Greer, 2010, p.4). Communication and responsibility go hand and hand when working on a project. If only, my husband had listened!




References

Greer, M. (2010). The project management minimalist: Just enough PM to rock your projects! (Laureate custom ed.). Baltimore: Laureate Education, Inc.

Gube, J.(2008). Eight tips on how to manage feature creep. Retrieved August 4, 2011 from: http://sixrevisions.com/project-management/eight-tips-on-how-to-manage-feature-creep/

Lynch, M. M., & Roecker, J. (2007). Project managing e-learning: A handbook for successful design, delivery, and management. London: Routledge. Copyright by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Portny, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., & Kramer, B. E. (2008). Project management: Planning, scheduling, and controlling projects. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.


Thursday, July 14, 2011

The Art of Communicating Effectively

“The newest computer can merely compound, at speed, the oldest problem in the relations between human beings, and in the end the communicator will be confronted with the old problem, of what to say and how to say it”. - Edward R. Murrow

Written text

E-mails or electronic communications are an easy way to communicate not only in the business world, but also in personal communication (to friends and family throughout the world). E-mails are convenient and can be considered a powerful medium but there are some major problems that exist with this type of correspondence (Enemark, 2006). The issues include:
  • E-mails lack facial expression and tone of voice
  • Instantaneous communication causes a sense of urgency sometimes pressuring e-mailers to respond carelessly
  • E-mail cannot adequately convey emotion
Although emails can be an excellent form of communication, the sender needs to be mindful of how the wording can negatively impact the intended message. In the Art of Effective Communication program (n.d.), the email was derogatory and indicated the sender (Jane) was very upset with her colleague (Mark). The message was unclear as to what the sender wanted as there were several requests embedded in the email. I know I would be displeased to be the recipient of this type of an email.


Audio

The audio component within the Art of Effective Communication program was pleasant and non-threatening. The voicemail message left by the sender indicated the urgency of the request for data, but did not sound displeased compared to the email version of the same discussion. Although the email and voice mail stated the same message, I would not be upset listening to the voice mail compared to my displeasure while reading that specific email. “When you call up a coworker and get their voicemail, make sure that you are prepared to leave an effective message, and make sure that a voicemail message is the appropriate way to contact your coworker. Succinct, purposeful communication, regardless of the medium, is effective and keeps everyone productive” (How-toGeek, 2011).


Video

The face to face conversation regarding the data situation was pleasant and casual. Jane did not appear upset or angry when asking Mark for his data. She stated concerns over possibly missing her own deadline in such an ‘apologetic’ way that I would want to assist her as soon as possible. “If ‘the medium is the message,’ your personality is the window through which the message must travel to be received, understood and acted upon by the audience” (Bergman, 2009).
Although all three media platforms were acceptable for delivering the message, I preferred (in this scenario) the casual conversation that occurred during the face to face communication. The perception was that Jane was asking for more of a favor than demanding a task be completed as implied in the email version.


Communicating with project team members

“The ability to communicate well, both orally and in writing, is a critical skill for project managers” (Portny et al, 2008, p. 357).“Rapport ‘is an interpersonal resonance of emotional expression,’ Morris says, ‘involving synchronous gesture, laughing, and smiling together. Once this rapport exists, it's a buffer against a moment in the negotiation when there's some friction.’ This buffer is hard to develop without speaking over the phone or in person. Those who negotiated by e-mail in Morris's study trusted each other less and weren't as interested in working together again” (Enemark, 2006). Moving forward, it is important to effectively communicate with all team members and stakeholders involved in a project. Multimedia tools can provide great benefits during a project given they are used appropriately and with purpose. The project manager needs to support his team and lead by example. All team members should know their roles and responsibilities and in doing so be able to communicate often and effectively (Portny et al, 2008).  


Lessons Learned

“Effective communication is 20% what you know and 80% how you feel about what you know”- Jim Rohn

It is critical to establish a rapport with your client when first consulting on a project. I believe a face to face conversation is the preferred method when you agree to a project. This allows both parties an opportunity to not only ‘put a face’ to future correspondence, but helps establish a rapport early in the partnership. At the end of the day, the project is something everyone should be proud to call their own.  




References


Author unknown (n.d.)Multimedia Program: "The Art of Effective Communication"

Bergman, E. (2009). Principles of Effective Face-to-Face Communication. Retrieved July 14, 2011 from: http://www.presentwithease.com/principles.html

Enemark, D. (2006). It's all about me: Why e-mails are so easily misunderstood. Retrieved July 14, 2011 from: http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0515/p13s01-stct.html

HowtoGeek (2011). How to Use Voicemail Effectively at Work. Retreived July 14, 2011 from: http://www.howtogeek.com/54044/how-to-use-voicemail-effectively-at-work/

Portny, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., & Kramer, B. E. (2008). Project management: Planning, scheduling, and controlling projects. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Thursday, July 7, 2011

Post Mortem or Lessons Learned

I was fortunate to be asked to work on a project several years ago that involved creating an in-house Critical Incident Stress team for an ambulance service (I was a full time employee at the time). A critical incident can be defined as, “an event which made you stop and think, or one that raised questions for you. It may have made you question an aspect of your beliefs, values, attitude or behaviour. It is an incident which in some way has had a significant impact on your personal and professional learning” (Language and Online Learning, 2011).

Paramedics work in stressful situations and sometimes see people at their worst or last moment in life. As a paramedic (back in the 80’s) we were always told to ‘deal with it’ as it was part of the job. Finding someone to speak about the incident was seen as cowardly and ‘weak’. Fortunately time and attitudes changed making it socially acceptable and mandatory (in some situations) to discuss certain incidents or calls. Creating an in-house team would allow easy access for paramedics and possibly reduce lost time from work due to critical incident stress. Other Emergency service agencies contracted outside organizations to perform critical debriefings or counselling, but we wanted to provide an alternative option to paramedics. Hopefully this would encourage more participation if it was easily accessible and less intimidating chatting with fellow colleagues.

Step 1 (An idea is born)
An incident occurred within the ambulance organization that resulted in one paramedic leaving due to critical incident stress. This was a wake up call for many of us given the paramedic is a seasoned soul who had worked for over twenty years. The concept for an in-house team was quickly conceived and presented to management for approval.

Step 2 (Organize team and begin work)
The team was selected and surprisingly enough there were more volunteers than we required so it was difficult, but necessary to keep the team small and focused. We participated in numerous brainstorming sessions and developed a confidential questionnaire for paramedics to complete regarding their knowledge on critical incident stress.

Step 3 (Looking forward)
Our final goal was to have our own team available for colleagues 24/7/365. We drafted our plan and discussed potential training needs for staff, interested in become team ‘counsellors’. We were fortunate to find enough qualified staff interested in becoming team members.

Step 4 (Identify tasks and phases)
Surveys were collected and the data collected showed that most medics did not understand what classified as a critical incident, therefore training sessions needed to be added to our task list.

Step 5 (Time and Effort)
Management was supportive of our project allowing us to meet during work time and also utilize existing office supplies for survey distribution. We had a specific timeline captured and our weekly meetings allowed us to remain on schedule.

Step 6 (Schedule)
Unfortunately we did not create an organized schedule, but rather went weekly to weekly based on discussions during those sessions.

Step 7 (Costs)
There was very little costs associated with the project except for the team’s time but it was decided early that we were volunteering our time to allow for costs to be allocated elsewhere if needed.

Step 8 (Project momentum)
Our enthusiasm and weekly meetings allowed us to keep the project moving despite a few obstacles along the way.

Step 9 (Scope creep)
We needed to modify the project slightly to incorporate some training for the paramedic staff based on survey results. This modification was agreed upon by all team members so there was no resistance felt.

Step 10 (Project complete)
The team was formalized and introduced to the paramedic staff on schedule and greeted with enthusiasm by management.

Mistakes Made

No formal project charter or statement of work was presented to the management team for approval. A proposal was designed and presented, but looking back it should have been more detailed and formalized (Greer, 2010)
The questionnaire received a poor response rate and I am not sure if it was due to being a paper version rather than electronic. I wonder if the response rate would have been higher using a tool such as survey monkey. http://www.surveymonkey.com/
A formalized schedule should have been created to assist with timelines for completion. Although the project was implemented by the proposed deadline it was not without frustration.
The team should have been compensated for their time as the weekly meetings and training session for the counsellors ate a lot more time than originally planned.

Small Success

When the request went out looking for volunteers already certified in critical incident stress management we discovered we had sufficient numbers so additional training was not required. This was a significant cost savings for us as we had not originally budgeted for staff training, but rather budgeted for the staff time during the counselling sessions

Lessons Learned

A formalized plan detailing every phase (conceive, define, start, perform, close) should have been documented and detailed allowing management and the team reference to refer when tasks became cloudy(Portny et al, 2008). One of the most frustrating parts of the project was dealing with some team members attitudes and beliefs on how the Critical team would function. Defining the roles and responsibilities of the critical incident stress team would have reduced some of the heated discussions that occurred during the performing phase of the project. Communication should have been more open among team members despite the culture surrounding the concept of the project. It is vital to “share the right messages with the right people in a timely manner” (Portny et al, 2008, p.357).

Post Mortem





Communication is such a key component to any project that when there was a break done in it, it not only frustrated all it made no sense. The entire team consisted of paramedics who are known to be effective communicators so wonder if an outside individual should have been placed on the team.
Overall, I am proud of what the team accomplished as the project is still operating today. It has gone through some slight variations and revisions but paramedics have found it to be user friendly. Management has provided some additional funding to compensate the in-house team if they are called out for extended duty. Critical incidents occur infrequently, but when it happens to you it is nice to know there is a shoulder to lean on to get you through the storm.

References

Greer, M. (2010). The project management minimalist: Just enough PM to rock your projects! (Laureate custom ed.). Baltimore: Laureate Education, Inc.

Language and Online Learning (2011). What is a ‘critical incident’? Retrieved July 7,  from: http://www.monash.edu.au/lls/llonline/writing/medicine/reflective/2.xml

Portny, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., & Kramer, B. E. (2008). Project management: Planning, scheduling, and controlling projects. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Monday, June 27, 2011

My piece of Heaven

I am fortunate to own a cottage on a small lake near our home. Most weekends I can be found sitting on my dock with laptop in hand listening to the family of Loons that reside on the lake. Who says distance learning is boring!




Project Management in Education and Training

Leaders are more powerful role models when they learn than when they teach.
- Rosabeth Moss Kantor




Welcome to my blog. My name is Tracy Gaunt and I am a graduate student with Walden currently studying project management. I look forward to the next eight weeks of learning and discovering innovative ways to manage projects.